Working Group Progress Report
Working Group Leaders
Name 1
:
Surname 1
:
Name 2
:
Surname 2
:
1) Scientific progress of your WG:
Please, rate the state of advancement of the various topics composing your WG programme (According to the Action IS0703 ERN-LWE project - pages 9-13)
Criteria
1: not developed yet
2: investigations: designed-in course
3: data: collected-analyzed
4: results: presentations (conferences, workshops)
5: results: publications (at least) in press (articles, chapters)
6 : final state - dissemination in the society (recommendations).
You can comment the state of advancement.
Working Group 1:
Early acquisition of writing skills (education): Describing the acquisition of writing by pupils with or without learning difficulties in their mother tongue (L1) and a second language (L2); understanding learning difficulties; analysing the impact of teaching situations.
Programme 1.1. Spelling acquisition
- Infralexical level
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
- Lexical level
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
- Morphosyntatical level
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 1.1.
:
Programme 1.2. Difficulties in writing and their impact on composition
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 1.2.
:
Programme 1.3. Text genre acquisition
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 1.3.
:
Working Group 2:
Improvements in written communication (education and workplace): describing the development of different writing skills in two languages; understanding the factors favouring the development of expertise; comparing and designing specific and appropriate training situations.
Programme 2.1. Improving writing in L1 and L2
- Transfers between L1 and L2 writing strategies
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
- Testing the effect of learning environments:
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 2.1.
:
Programme 2.2. Comparative analysis of genres and genre teaching methods
- Comparisons of genres and genre teaching practices.
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
- Permeability of genres between L1 and L2:
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comment on programme 2.2.
:
Working Group 3:
Design of written documents (workplace): describing how professional writers manage their skills and knowledge; improving documents’ communicative impact; modelling expertise.
Programme 3.1. How the impact of text design on the user can provide insight for the writer
- Studying, via eye-tracking the effect of poorly-designed instructions
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
- Studying the impact of text design on decision-making
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 3.1.
:
Program 3.2. : Professional writers’ strategies
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 3.2.
:
Working Group 4
Technological advances in writing tools (cross-disciplinary): developing and standardising technological tools for studying and fostering the writing process; developing a database.
Programme 4.1. Eye movements during writing: reading as a writing subprocess
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on the programme 4.1.
:
Programme 4.2. Impact of digital technology on writing and the learning of writing skills.
- Comparing handwriting and typewriting:
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
- Observing one’s own activity via digital recordings
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Programme 4.3. Data standardisation
Programme 4.3. Data standardisation
:
1 (not yet)
2
3
4
5
6 (achieved)
Comments on programme 4.3.
:
2) Outcomes of your WG
According to the Action IS0703 ERN-LWE project (pages 13-14), the programmes of the four Working Groups (WGs) will be completed within 4 years (may 2008 – may 2012). In between the meetings, workshops and conferences, the WGs will work remotely, via the Website. The missions of each WG will include:
I. eading the programmes and projects so that concrete outcomes be discussed each year at the WG’s meeting and formally presented during the Workshops: data, analysis, preliminary findings, findings, recommendations:
During the 2010-2011 period, have you:
If "yes" or "in course", indicate :
The place
:
The number of COST participants
:
The number of invited experts (non COST members)
:
The outcomes of this meeting
:
Upload the minutes and report of your WG (editorial) meeting(s)
:
Comments on WG meetings
:
If "yes", indicate:
What were the topics from your WG programme you focused on ?
:
How many COST members were invited to present?
:
How many invited experts were present ?
:
Comments on the Workshop Contribution
:
If "yes", describe:
:
II. structuring the programmes in such a way that new researchers and/or countries can join them and enhance their development. This is entirely feasible, given the openings that have deliberately been built into each project: inter-language comparisons, comparisons of teaching methods and genres, investigations involving writers of different ages and with different levels of expertise. The aim will be to extend observations right across Europe, all the while keeping scientific questions to the fore:
Briefly explain the manner you have contacted/have been contacted by other colleagues from other countries
:
Enter below the Name, Surname, University, Country, E-mails of new members joining your WG this year (2010-2011). Please note that the MC in Potsdam will have to state their definite integrations, on the basis of CV and WG leaders recommendations. Please, upload the CV of each ones.
Researcher 1:
Name
:
Surname
:
University
:
Country (COST eligible)
:
E-mail
:
Please enter a valid email address (e.g. you@provider.com).
Upload CV
:
Upload Letter of interest (if existing)
:
Researcher 2:
Name
:
Surname
:
University
:
Country (COST eligible)
:
E-mail
:
Please enter a valid email address (e.g. you@provider.com).
Upload CV
:
Upload Letter of interest (if existing)
:
Researcher 3:
Name
:
Surname
:
University
:
Country (COST eligible)
:
E-mail
:
Please enter a valid email address (e.g. you@provider.com).
Upload CV
:
Upload Letter of interest (if existing)
:
Researcher 3:
Name
:
Surname
:
University
:
Country (COST eligible)
:
E-mail
:
Please enter a valid email address (e.g. you@provider.com).
Upload CV
:
Upload Letter of interest (if existing)
:
(if more slots are necessary for new members, please, valid entirely this form first and fill this part on more time, indicating at the beginning your WG number)
III. encouraging the active participation of junior researchers:
In which manner have you improved the participation of junior researchers in your WG group ?
:
IV. facilitating the mobility of researchers:
Have you promoted the STSM mobility for instance in your WG group ?
:
V. disseminating research findings at the very highest scientific level (international communication and publications in journals indexed in the Journal of Citation Reports):
The list of publications of every member has been asked directly (according to the Core Group Meeting decision in Amsterdam 2009 - enhancing the publication plan). Can you estimate the number of papers emerging from your WG ?
:
VI. drafting recommendations based on findings:
Please, draft here the main recommendations emerging from the results of your WG ?
:
VII. sharing all the data that is collected (database on the Website) and all useful documents (references, bibliographies, manuals, etc.);
If "Yes", could you describe briefly the principles and state of advancement?
:
VIII. inviting and working with international experts, either at an individual level or at the level of the associations.
Are you working with international experts / associations within your WG? If so, could you indicate their name, university and country ?
:
General comments on outcomes from your WG
:
3) WG publication plan
If "Yes", could you provide the title, the type of publication and a brief abstract (3-4 lines) ?
WG publication 1
Title
:
Type
:
Edited book
Special Issue
Paper
Brief description (3-4 lines)
:
WG publication 2
Title
:
Type
:
Edited book
Special Issue
Paper
Brief description (3-4 lines)
:
WG publication 3
Title
:
Type
:
Edited book
Special Issue
Paper
Brief description (3-4 lines)
:
General comments on your publication plan
:
4) Monitoring your Working Group
Describe the innovative knowledge resulting from COST networking through your WG. (Specific examples of Results vs. Objectives)
[Required]
:
Describe the significant scientific breakthroughs as part of your WG. (Specific examples)
[Required]
:
Describe the tangible medium term socio-economic impacts achieved or expected. (Specific examples)
[Required]
:
Describe the additional knowledge obtained from working with other disciplines within your WG framework. (Specific examples)
[Required]
:
Evaluate whether the level of inter-disciplinarity is sufficient to potentially provide scientific impacts. (Specific examples)
[Required]
:
Evaluate whether the level of inter-disciplinarity is sufficient to potentially provide socio-economic impacts. (Specific examples)
[Required]
:
5) To conclude
In order to recap the activity of your WG group in 2010-2011, please, enter a comprehensive abstract (around 150 words) recapitulating the main activities and major advancements of your group, at scientific and networking levels
[Required]
:
Thank you very much for your contribution.